Blog Watch

Posts Tagged ‘boehner’

Right Struggles To Unite Opposition To Health Overhaul

As the health overhaul debate continues, it’s clear that Republican leaders are still struggling to find a message. Granted, one prominent theme can be built around ever-present attacks on the Democratic plan’s sizeable role for the federal government as well as its burgeoning spending. Still, right-leaning commentators remain unhappy with the GOP’s attempts to reclaim the debate  – in other words, the recently released GOP health bill. Some conservative activists are so restless and discontented, they plan to take to Capitol Hill today with protests planned for today.

Heritage’s Conn Carroll posts a chart that quite clearly illustrates conservative concerns about the role of government.  It tracks changes in the percent of health care dollars spent by the government since 1993 and how that may change should the House version of a health overhaul become law:

And while Republican lawmakers were seeking to avoid the above scenario in their new alternative health overhaul plan, its reception contiues to get worse after an official Congressional Budget Office score was released yesterday evening. 

Director Douglas Elmendorf says the bill would reduce the deficit by $68 billion between 2010-2019 and insure an additional three million people.  It would also modestly reduce premiums.

Liberal commentators are pouncing – arguing that the bill covers almost no additional people and actually reduces the deficit less than the current Democratic House version. 

The Washington Post’s Ezra Klein seems incredulous:

The Democrats, constrained by reality, produced a far better plan than [House Minority Leader] Boehner, who was constrained solely by his political imagination and legislative skill. This is a major embarrassment for the Republicans. It’s one thing to keep your cards close to your chest. Republicans are in the minority, after all, and their plan stands no chance of passage. It’s another to lay them out on the table and show everyone that you have no hand, and aren’t even totally sure how to play the game. The Democratic plan isn’t perfect, but in comparison, it’s looking astonishingly good.

Jonathan Cohn parses CBO’s score and concludes: “So, yes, the Republican health care bill will lower premiums overall. But many people in poor health will see their premiums go up. And many people will get lower premiums only because they’re getting inferior coverage. Meanwhile, more than 50 million people will have no insurance whatsoever.”

And some conservatives aren’t too pleased either.  John Goodman of the National Center for Policy Analysis titles his post: “Republicans Show Why They Deserve to be the Minority Party.”  According to Goodman, “As I’ve said before, the opposition forces inside the Beltway are in total disarray. The only thing that has mattered in the past six months has been grass roots.”

Similarly, Philip Klein of the American Spectator calls himself “unimpressed” by the proposal and says, “The GOP proposal isn’t what I would consider real reform. It’s more of a document that Republicans have put out so they can say they have some sort of health care bill that reduces premiums at a fraction of the cost of the Democrats’ bill.”

But Hot Air’s Ed Morrissey is satisfied, he writes, “For the 87% of Americans who have insurance and who overwhelmingly like the system, this is a much better prescription for real cost savings, and without the heavy government intervention that threatens the liberty and economic stability of Americans.”

In the meantime, conservative protestors from around the nation are descending on Capitol Hill in a health care event known as Operation Housecall.  The event was organized by Minnesota Rep. Michelle Bachman, and as Patricia Murphy Reports, she urged demosntrators to “Go into the Capitol and find members of Congress…Don’t bring your pitchforks, bring your video cameras. And get them on record saying how they’re going to vote and why. And tell them, ‘Take your hands off my health care!’ “

Thursday, November 5th, 2009

More On The GOP Health Bill

Even though the venerable New York Times says it “has no chance of passing,” buzz is building around a GOP alternative health plan that counts among its key provisions enhancing Health Savings Accounts, allowing dependents to remain on their parents’ policies through age 25 and encouraging the sale of insurance policies across state lines.

The bill was released yesterday evening, and The Washington Post’s Ben Pershing reports: “[House Minority Leader John Boehner] said he also expected to have the GOP’s bill online for 72 hours, though it remains unclear whether the minority’s proposal will actually get a shot on the floor. …. Some GOP lawmakers have used controversial language in criticizing the Democrats’ bill. On the House floor Monday, Rep.  Virginia Foxx (R-N.C.) said:  ‘ I believe we have more to fear from the potential of that bill passing than we do from any terrorist right now in any country. ‘ Asked for his reaction to Foxx’s comment, Boehner said  ‘ members are entitled to their opinions ‘  but wouldn’t say whether he agreed with the sentiment. “ 

Bloggers reacted even when there was only a draft:

NPR’s April Fulton writes on their Health Blog that the plan is creating “a strong feeling of deja vu.”  Fulton continues, “That’s because the 230-page draft contains a laundry list of material the GOP has trotted out for years but has never quite gotten through Congress.”

 Wonk Room’s Igor Volsky quips, “We Read the GOP Health Care Plan So You Don’t Have To.” Volsky offers a brief summary of the plan and concludes, “In short, the amendment shifts the costs and risks of insurance onto individuals and divides the market into low-cost plans for the healthy and high-cost insurance for the sick.”

Think Progress’ Matthew Yglesias isn’t impressed either:

If you’re uninsured, this won’t help you.

If you’re insured, but you worry that circumstances beyond your control—a global financial meltdown leading to layoffs at your company, say—this won’t help you.

If you’re insured, but you worry that if you get sick your insurer will gin up some pretext to drop your coverage, this won’t help you.

If you’re insured but your premiums are escalating so fast you worry that you won’t be able to afford to keep paying them, this won’t help you.

Politico Pulse interviews Boehner spokesman Michael Steel, who defends the plan:

The GOP plan, not the Democrats’ trillion-dollar government takeover, is what most Americans want. It focuses on lowering health care costs and increasing access to quality care – including for those with pre-existing conditions – at a price our country can afford. Our plan does not try to do EVERYTHING because the American know we can’t pay for that. When the Democrats criticize the scope of our bill, they are, in fact, making our point.

Meanwhile, conservative commentators are encouraged by news that a health overhaul bill could be pushed into the new year.  

Hot Air’s Ed Morrissey says President Obama’s other priority — a cap-and-trade bill — could be in danger as well., “If the health-care overhaul gets pushed into 2010, that strategy goes out the window — for both bills.  The closer their votes come to Election Day, the less enthusiastic red-state Democrats will get about either of them, perhaps especially cap-and-trade.  With majorities of likely voters unhappy with both bills, Democrats would be daring the electorate to throw them out of power in the House, and handing the Republicans an easy campaign against big government, high taxation, and undisciplined spending.”

And Reason’s Peter Suderman thinks the Right’s efforts to slow down the bills’ progress are working:

Opposition strategy on health care has consisted of three parts—delay, delay, and delay—on the theory that the longer this drags on, the less likely it is to pass. I think that theory is basically sound: Pollster.com shows opposition to the health-care bill rising pretty steadily throughout the year. Indeed, this tactic—let’s call it the Rolling Stones-strategy—recently pushed public opposition to the plan past the 50 percent mark, proving that for those trying to take down the once-inevitable health-care bill, time is most definitely on their side.

Wednesday, November 4th, 2009

New GOP Health Care Strategies

The GOP and conservatives appear to be shifting opposition strategies as Democrats press forward with reform efforts (The House is scheduled to debate its almost 2,000 page overhaul bill this week.)

The GOP is reportedly set to release a new alternative to the House bill.  Minority Leader John Boehner said on Sunday: “What we do is we try to make the current system work better.”

Boehner delivered the Saturday Republican video address, and Sarah Palin  plugged it on her popular Facebook page, calling it a “game changer”.  According to Hot Air’s Allah Pundit, it was an unusual endorsement from Palin, who has been critical of party leaders.

A bill has not been released yet, but the GOP’s congressional website says it will be offered during floor debate this week.  According to the post, the bill emphasizes:

  • Number one: let families and businesses buy health insurance across state lines.
  • Number two: allow individuals, small businesses, and trade associations to pool together and acquire health insurance at lower prices, the same way large corporations and labor unions do.
  • Number three: give states the tools to create their own innovative reforms that lower health care costs.
  • Number four: end junk lawsuits that contribute to higher health care costs by increasing the number of tests and procedures that physicians sometimes order not because they think it’s good medicine, but because they are afraid of being sued.”

Time’s Karen Tumulty reacted, “But when you look at what the House Minority Leader is describing as an “innovative” solution, you’ve got to wonder. Specifically, he points to the kind of high-risk pools that many states have established for those who find themselves uninsurable as a result of a serious illness. That is not a new idea–some states have had these pools for three decades–or a solution for many. These pools already exist in more than 30 states, but they tend to be too expensive for those with limited means to buy into. And often, people cannot get into them for as long as a year after they apply.”

Elsewhere, conservative bloggers are latching onto a new opposition meme: Democratic lawmakers used “budget gimmicks” in order to receive specific cost estimates from the Congressional Budget Office.

James Capretta writes on Critical Condition, “In sum, then, the House plan is not a $900 billion program. It’s a $725 billion tax increase and a $1.5 trillion spending program. Tax and spend, indeed.”

And Dennis Smith of Heritage thinks the Finance Committee bill suffers from a similar affliction: “In the desperate attempt to portray their massive new spending bill as ‘budget neutral,’ Congress and the Obama Administration are relying on more desperate measures to hide the true cost of the legislation.”  Smith points to a specific provision that states the Secretary of Health and Human Services can reduce subsidies or credits should the bill increase the federal deficit.

Monday, November 2nd, 2009